Amended 4/28/05

 

LAW ENFORCEMENT

April 14, 2005

Minutes

 

 

Members Present:         Debbie DeLeon, Deb Nolan, Dale Copedge, Marc Thomas, Randy Schafer, Don Vickers and Board Chairperson Mark Grebner

 

Members Absent:         None

 

Others Present:             John Neilsen, Tim Gill, Jared Cypher, Gene Wriggelsworth, Mary Sabaj, Sue LeDuc, Steve Dougan, Judge Collette, Judge Garcia, Beth McLaughlin and others

 

The meeting was called to order by Chairperson DeLeon at 6:06 p.m. in the Personnel

Conference Room of the Human Services Building, 5303 S. Cedar, Lansing.

 

Approval of the March 10 and March 31, 2005 Minutes

MOVED BY COMM. SCHAFER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. NOLAN, TO APPROVE THE MARCH 10 MINUTES AS SUBMITTED AND THE MARCH 31 MINUTES AS AMENDED.  MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

 

Additions to the Agenda

4b.       Additional Information

6.         Update Regarding Road Patrol Meeting

 

Limited Public Comment:          None

 

MOVED BY COMM. SCHAFER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. VICKERS, TO APPROVE A CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

 

1.         911 Advisory Board – Resolution Authorizing an Additional Appropriation for the Necessary Site Preparation Work for the Ingham County Radio Communications System Project

 

2a.       Sheriff’s Office – Resolution to Authorize Participation in the Michigan Emergency Management Assistance Compact

 

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

 

MOVED BY COMM. SCHAFER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. VICKERS, TO APPROVE THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.  MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

 

 

3.         Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad – Resolution Authorizing Adoption of a New Interlocal Agreement for the Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad

 

MOVED BY COMM. SCHAFER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. THOMAS, TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF A NEW INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE TRI-COUNTY METRO NARCOTICS SQUAD.

 

Mr. Neilsen explained this Resolution authorizes the adoption of a new interlocal agreement for Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad (Metro) which also:

·        Replaces the existing contractual agreements;

·        Establishes a Contingency Fund;

·        Authorizes the one-time use of Metro contingency funds up to $24,003.87 to cover the shortfall in funding for a Sheriff’s Deputy due to the withdrawal of two local government contributors in Ingham County.

 

The operational costs of Metro has traditionally been paid for through a combination of grants, drug forfeiture funds, and in-kind services by the participating agencies.  The participating Counties will continue to pay the grant match for the Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys and appropriate funds to pay for the operational expenses of the squad. 

 

Mr. Neilsen further explained the appropriated funds are made on the basis of each County’s population.  As forfeiture funds are received, participating Counties receive reimbursement in proportion to their contribution for operational expenses, up to the total appropriated.  Once this reimbursement level has been obtained, all participating entities receive reimbursement in proportion to their total contribution of law enforcement personnel, contributed grant match and appropriated funds for operational expenses.

 

Mr. Gill, Metro Squad, stated Metro was established in 1968 with a mission to investigate drug trafficking crimes.  Ingham, Eaton and Clinton County Sheriff Departments participate in Metro along with Lansing’s and East Lansing’s Police Departments.  The City of Lansing acts as the fiduciary for the agreement.  The Metro Squad currently consists of thirteen sworn police officers, two secretaries, two Ingham County Prosecutors and one Eaton County Prosecutor. 

 

Each agency pays for its own wage and fringe benefits for their positions with the exception of those costs which are paid for through the Grant.  Metro is the only drug team in the tri-county area. However, the City of Lansing has a team which deals with prostitutes, drugs, etc.  Mr. Gill distributed information pamphlets to the new Commissioners which further explained the purpose of the Metro Squad. 

 

Mr. Gill stated he would like East Lansing, Meridian Township and MSU to join the Metro Squad.  These entities can afford to have an officer on the Squad.  Comm. Thomas asked which entities withdrew from the Squad.  Mr. Gill stated Lansing Township

 

 

withdrew January 1, 2005 and the City of Mason withdrew in July 2004.  He further explained the Mason Police Chief has asked to fund their team position within their budget.

 

Comm. Thomas expressed his concern regarding the precedent being set with the withdrawal of two agencies from the Squad.  Its as if Metro is saying its alright to withdraw and still receive Metro services which are being funded by the remaining Metro participating agencies.  Mr. Wriggelsworth stated that is his same concern.  If the withdrawn agencies do not return in time for the next budget, he would not recommend the continuation of their Metro services.  He stated he expressed this concern at the Metro Board meeting recently. 

 

In response to Comm. Thomas, Mr. Wriggelsworth explained the funding structure of the Squad.  This information was contained in Article II of the Interlocal Agreement which was included in the agenda packet. 

 

Comm. Vickers suggested that Metro representatives should attend functions at local municipalities to better inform them of the Metro services and to possibly receive funding.  Mr. Gill stated he has been in Aurelius Township, Mason and Meridian Township.  He understands the importance of this outreach.  The Squad is doing its best to visit the many local municipalities. 

 

Mr. Gill explained the only change to the current Agreement is the creation of the Contingency Fund.  The funding arrangements will remain the same.

 

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

 

2.         Sheriff’s Office

            b.         Power Point Presentation on I-96 Fog Related Incident

 

Mr. Wriggelsworth conducted the Presentation to better inform the Committee of the incident.  The Presentation contained photographs of the incident and the assistance received from several municipalities at the scene.  The Emergency Management process was very effective.  The crash occurred over a half-hour period of time, over 50 citations were issued and over 70 accident reports were filed.

 

Chairperson DeLeon asked if anything was learned regarding the activation process.  Mr. Wriggelsworth stated there were communication problems.  The new 911 radio system should take care of these problems.  Also, most victims were sent to Sparrow.  Ingham Regional Medical Center was ready to receive victims of the incident.  However, they only received a few accident victims. 

 

Mr. Wriggelsworth also stated the 911 Center assumed the Michigan State Police would respond to the incident due to information they may have over-heard on their car radios.  This was a mistake and it slowed their response time.   He further stated that there were no deaths contributed to a slowed response time.  The Michigan State Police will be specifically notified of any future incidents.  Mr. Gill also explained the Michigan State Police have three different radios in their vehicles.  This makes it difficult for them to respond to incidents of which they have not specifically been notified.

 

Comm. Schafer complimented Mr. Wriggelsworth and the Sheriff’s Department for their response to the incident.  Over the years, it has been phenomenal to witness the cooperation of entities during emergency situations. 

 

Comm. Dougan stated use of cell phones during the incident speaks to the need to look at financial participation by cell phone users to help fund 911 services. 

 

In response to Chairperson DeLeon, Mr. Wriggelsworth stated a post incident evaluation was conducted.  Chairperson DeLeon stated she would like to see the report.

 

c.         Update on Sheriff’s Office on April 2, 2005 Mutual Aid Response in East Lansing

 

Chairperson DeLeon stated this item was placed on tonight’s agenda at the request of Comm. Nolan.   Mr. Wriggelsworth stated the local municipalities assisted with the anticipated civil disturbance. He informed Comm. Nolan that he was not aware if East Lansing has drafted a report of the incident.  Responders to an incident are not a part of the decision making process. 

 

4.         Controller’s Office

            a.         Discussion of 2006 Budget Guidelines

 

Mr. Neilsen introduced Jared Cypher and Beth McLaughlin, Budget staff, to the Committee.    He further stated the Guidelines contain information from department heads regarding their budgetary needs for 2006.  The Committee held a brief discussion regarding the draft Resolution and attachments which were distributed earlier this evening. 

 

Comm. Schafer expressed his continuing concern that many people will not receive public safety services due to alternative funding issues.  Chairperson DeLeon stated a special meeting will be held in the near future to specifically discuss this topic.

 

Mr.  Neilsen stated he has requested the Sheriff’s Office to notify him of dates which it would be available to attend the special meeting.  Once he receives that information, he will coordinate the dates with this Committee.  The meeting should be held within the next month or so. 

 

            b.         Discussion of 2006 Update of County Fees

 

Mr. Neilsen explained the adoption of Resolution #02-155 directs the Controller’s Office to annually review the fees and to recommend adjustments where necessary.  The fee recommendations are being presented at the current round of committee meetings as a discussion item.  A resolution approving any fee increases will be presented at the next round of meetings.  The Committee reviewed the Fee information contained in the agenda packet. 

 

Comm. Schafer asked about the issue of the County billing insurance companies when a paramedic responds to a call from a resident.  Mr. Neilsen stated he would look into this matter and report back to this Committee.  Comm. Schafer stated it is legal to ask for reimbursement from insurance companies in this instance.  Chairperson Grebner stated this is a good idea to consider.  He then asked if the County would charge those residents without ambulance service coverage. 

 

Comm. Vickers asked if some of the Drain Office’s fees could be clarified.  The fees he spoke about were the residential soil and the commercial minor distribution soil erosion permits.  Mr. Neilsen stated those fees would be clarified prior to Finance.

 

5.         Community Corrections Advisory Board  - Presentation by the Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee (JUCC)

 

After consulting with the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, it was decided that this presentation would include the Judiciary Committee as it is on that agenda also this evening.

 

Chairperson Holman called the Judiciary Committee to order at 7:04 p.m.  All Committee members were present at this time with the exception of Comm. Weatherwax-Grant.

 

Ms. Sabaj explained the JUCC is a spin off from discussions regarding jail over-crowding.  JUCC meetings are held on a regular basis rather than on a crisis basis.  Meetings are held every other month unless more meetings are necessitated. 

 

The JUCC’s March 2005 Recommendations are contained in the agenda packet.  The Recommendations include the request for a part-time Circuit Court/County funded position to provide assistance for Pretrial Services to enhance provided services and to reduce, where appropriate, Jail utilization for the Circuit Court pretrial population.  Also, to implement an objective assessment process to be conducted by Pretrial Services to assist in identifying offender risk and needs and to help target appropriate pretrial supervision and treatment resources.  Other Recommendations were reviewed.

 

Ms. Sabaj stated Recommendation number twelve recommends that the CCAB revise the Appendix A eligibility offense list to increase access to community programming and recommend that the Life Time Ban offense list also be revised by the BOC to increase the number of offenses for which a Judge may sentence an offender to probation residential services.  Ms. Sabaj summarized the history of the Appendix eligibility list.

(Comm. Weatherwax-Grant arrived at 7:13 p.m.)

 

Due to neighborhood concerns regarding having a treatment facility near their homes, offenders are being released from jail early because they do not qualify for any treatment programs.  Ms. Sabaj stated this topic will be scheduled for a future Law Enforcement meeting to discuss possible revisions to Appendix A.

 

Chairperson DeLeon asked about Recommendation number six:  Revise the Probation Violation Response Guide.  Ms. Sabaj explained this list is used by probation officers.  The Guide has been approved by the MDOC and has been implemented.  Judge Collette stated the County will probably never have a time without jail over-crowding.  The CCAB has made significant impacts where possible.  He further stated the JUCC will continue to meet to identify and address areas of concern.  

 

 The Committee continued their review of the Recommendations.  Ms. Sabaj informed the Committee that the preliminary numbers for the HOPE program indicate a 90% program completion rate.  Eligible participants who opted not to participate in the program equaled 62.5%.  Also, there is a 70+% graduation rate.  Thirty-seven percent of those who opted out of the program continue to do well.  Ms. Sabaj stated the program has had amazing results. 

 

In response to Comm. Swope, Ms. Sabaj explained that revising Appendix A could increase access to community programming. 

 

Judge Collette spoke regarding the new Jackson facility for lower level offenders.  He encouraged the Board of Commissioners to tour this facility. 

 

Chairperson DeLeon stated this Committee will look forward to updated status reports regarding the JUCC’s 2005 Recommendations.  Judge Collette stated the Committee members can contact him with

 

any questions or concerns.  Chairperson Grebner stated any proposed changes to the Appendix A list should be submitted to this Committee.

 

 

Announcements:           None

Public Comment:          None

 

The meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Debra Neff