Amended 11/19/07

HUMAN SERVICES

November 5, 2007

Minutes

 

PRESENT:         Rebecca Bahar-Cook, Mark Grebner, Curtis Hertel, Andy Schor, Tim Soule and Board Chairperson Marc Thomas.


ABSENT:        Mike Severino.


OTHERS:        Jared Cypher, Dean Sienko, Timothy Perrone, Melany Mack, Judy Craddock and others.


   The Human Services Committee meeting was called to order at approximately 7:02 p.m., in Conference Room A of the Human Services Building, 5303 S. Cedar, Lansing..

Approval of the October 15, 2007 Minutes

MOVED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK,  SUPPORTED BY COMM. SCHOR TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 15, 2007 MINUTES.  MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent: Comm Severino

Additions to the Agenda
Additional Community Agency information

Item #3 pulled.  .

Limited Public Comment:    None

MOVED BY COMM. SCHOR, SUPPORTED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK TO APPROVE A CONSENT AGENDA FOR ITEMS:

 

2.     Health Department

  a.       Resolution to Authorize 2007-2008 Medical Provider Agreement with the Ingham Health Plan Corporation

  b.       Resolution to Renew a Lease Agreement for the Pediatric Dental Clinic at 2815 S. Pennsylvania

 

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent:  Comm. Severino

 

            1a.       Public Hearings - Amendment to the Ingham County Sanitary Code to  Require Food Services Establishments to Provide Signage Referring                            Complaints of  Alleged Foodborne Illness to the Ingham County Health  Department


Comm. Hertel explained that no action will be taken on either of the public hearings at this meeting.  Action will be taken at a subsequent meeting in order to allow the committee the opportunity to consider what has been said at this meeting by the public.
           
Comm. Schor explained his reasons for the ordinance changes to the Sanitary Code. If the restaurant receives a call from a patron they should give out the Health Department’s telephone number and signs should be posted.

Andy Deloney, representing the Michigan Restaurant Association explained that this is an issue that is taken very seriously.  The second part “posting” is of concern to him because this will scare patrons.  They feel the customer will look at the sign and be concerned about eating at the establishment.

 

Comm. Schor indicated that he is sensitive to the concern.  He explained that the Health Department could put up a notification stating that this is a requirement for all restaurants by the Health Department.  Comm. Schor asked if there is some language that could be used that would make the Michigan Restaurant Association members more comfortable.

 

Mr. Deloney feels that the 1st part of the concern would take care of the problem and would be sufficient.  Outside the County border, 15 minutes away, they will not have this requirement, Ingham County establishments could be affected if people only have to travel 15 minutes to an establishment without this requirement.


Richard Bruner, General Manager of the University Club of MSU distributed a Common Foodborne Pathogens sheet.  He asked the committee to notice the incubation period and explained that if someone gets a foodborne illness at a restaurant they will be far removed from the establishment before the symptoms hit; so they would still have to look up the phone number from another site.  He has no problem with the first part of the proposal.  The second part he feels would have a negative effect on his patrons.  Mr. Bruner asked “Where in my lobby would I want to put up a sign that says don’t eat in my restaurant it’s safer to eat at home”?   


Will Tyler White – Owner of the Travelers Club Okemos and member of the Michigan Restaurant Association – Mr. White echoed what the other speakers have said.  It is a practical matter that is not enforceable.  It is pointless.  People will ignore the posting.  If you post this sign you will get a lot of calls that are not food related.  A public education campaign would work better than posting a sign or having a proposed ordinance.

 

Comm. Bahar-Cook asked for clarification that Mr. White was okay with the 1st part and that only the posting of the sign is what he objects too.

 

Mr. White stated that he does not think it should be required he does that already and has  told his patrons to call the Health Department or go to the hospital and they will call the Health Department, so he does not have a problem with that.  It is the 2nd part he objects to.

 

Comm. Thomas asked Mr. White if he had actually had a call from a patron that he has actually instructed to go to the Health Department.

Mr. White responded that yes he has and feels any responsible restaurant owner would.

Chairperson Hertel closed the public hearing on this matter.


Chairperson Hertel asked that staff bring back to the Committee two versions of the proposal, one with part two and one without part two.  He wants to see both options and a third if someone has one.   Bring them to the next meeting on November 19th.

            1b        Amendment to the Regulation Requiring a License for Retail Sale of_Tobacco, to Prohibit Sale of Tobacco to Minors, and to Restrict

                         Location of Tobacco Vending Machines

Dr. Seinko gave a short synopsis on the changes of the regulation.   In addition to it being unlawful to sell tobacco to an individual under 18 years of age, it would also be unlawful to attempt to sell or deliver tobacco to an individual under 18 years of age. 


The Health Department also wants to change a license from a 3 yr to a 1 yr term.  This would be helpful to vendors who might sell their operation.  They would only incur a one year expense instead of a 3 year expense.


They propose in Article 4 to make an amendment to allow the Health Department to use some of the revenues generated from this program to assist them in their tobacco control programs.  In Article 4 Section 3 on the license fee, they want to bring everybody up to the same level.  In the past vendors who have paid a fee to municipalities would not pay any difference from the municipal fee to the County fee.  Now they want everyone in the County to pay the same amount.  So if they pay a certain amount to a municipality then a difference would have to go to the County fee.  For fee distribution they would like 30 days notice.  If an employee or agent of a retailer violates this, on a 1st offense, they would like an option to have that person pay a fine or attend a tobacco education program that the County would provide.


In Article 7 Section 3 in terms of license suspension and revocation, change where it says the Health Officer shall suspend or revoke the license, where ever it says “shall” change it to “may” to give us the option to consider all circumstances.


Susan Brown from Lansing Township – If retailers are going to sell a product that minors are not supposed to have; then they ought to be paying their fair share to make sure illegal sales are not taking place to keep minors from taking up smoking.    


Comm. Hertel announced that the public hearing on this issue is closed.  Amendment is to be brought to the next meeting on November 19th.


4.         Controller’s Office – Resolution Authorizing 2008 Agreements for_Community Agencies
Jared Cypher explained that $125,985 was allocated for Human Services Committee Community agencies.   The Judiciary Committee gave $5,650 of the money that was allocated to them to Human Services for a new total of $131,635.   If every existing agency was given a flat appropriation for 2008 there would be approximately $16,000 to $18,000 remaining to split between the new agencies that applied.  If you include an agency that I called on the total would be $115,725 without the agency it’s $113,108.

Representatives of the community agencies in attendance identified themselves.  Ten groups were absent:   Cristo Rey Community Center Roots & Wings, Cristo Rey Community Center Prescription Assistance, Listening Ear, MSU Detroit College of Law, MSU Kinship Care Resource Center, South Lansing Community Development Assoc., St. Vincent Catholic Charities/Ballentine, St. Vincent Catholic Charities/CAIR, Westside Community YMCA, Women’s Center of Greater Lansing.


Chairperson Hertel excused anyone who is happy with what they were given last year and would accept the same for 2008.

Addiction Relief & Support Services. Comm. Bahar-Cook inquired about  other agencies that do this work and the duplication of services and asked why would the County want to give money for duplication of services?  David Beatty replied that many do not have a 501c3, Addition Relief and Support Services has worked to get a 501c3.  There is not enough transitional housing for homeless people.  The need is still there in spite of the duplication.  Eaton and Clinton County do not have any transitional housing.  So Addiction Relief & Support Services serve some of their homeless people as well.


Comm. Bahar-Cook asked if they had ever approached the other two counties for grants.  Mr. Beatty replied that he has not asked the other counties for grants.

 

Gateway Community Services:  Dennis Neuner, Executive Director addressed the Committee. 

Comm. Bahar-Cook asked since Gateway Community Services’ application mentioned Tri-County services more than any other, has Gateway requested money from the other counties.  Mr. Neuner indicated that he has not requested funding from other counties at this time.  However, since his becoming Director in May, Gateway has had some success achieving funding from other sources such as Michigan Works. 


In response to Comm. Bahar-Cook, Mr. Neuner explained the services provided to their clients, indicating that the cost to house young people off the streets, try to enhance their education, provide them employment and develop their skills for independent living is $5,650 a year per person.  This cost is small and justifiable compared to the $39,000-$45,000 it would cost to house them in a public correctional facility.


Comm. Schor asked how many years Gateway Community Services has been getting funding from the County.  Mr. Neuner answered 6 or 7 years but isn’t certain.


Comm. Grebner gave a brief history on the length of time Gateway has been receiving funds from the County. 

Comm. Schor indicated that he would like to give money to the new agencies and try to phase out the old agencies and expect them to work toward finding other methods of funding.  He asked Mr. Neuner how they work in conjunction with the courts or county resources.


Mr. Neuner responded that they have referrals from the courts, youth center, hospitals, jails, schools.

 

Mr. Neuner added that Gateway has asked for a $2,300 increase for Gateway Direct Care workers in order to give them an increase in salary of a $1.00 an hour to help recognize the important work they do.  It will take them to slightly above minimum wage.  Mr. Neuner stated that since he became Director he has realized the funding resources for Gateway are way too few and he is trying to diversify the funding for Gateway.


Eve Inc. – Susan Schultz, Executive Director.  The shelter is known as Eve’s House, a program for domestic violence victims as well as very extensive support services, primarily counseling, advocacy, providing public awareness in to the Community and working with youth.  Their request is for some assistance with supplementary money to help underwrite a portion of the crisis line, advocacy, counseling and additional cost.  The need comes about as a result of budget cuts and the fact that this organization is heavily grant funded.


Comm. Bahar-Cook asked Ms. Schultz to clarify the answer on the application to question 3a: Have you ever received funding from Ingham County in the past?  You responded no but it is my understanding that you appeared before the Judiciary Committee and they are covering that gap for you. 

Ms Schultz explained that those funds were for the Personal Protection Office which is a separate part from the shelter operation.  That was funded by the STOP Grant now the STOP Grant has been cut.  The Judiciary Committee has come forward with $13,000 to help make that part of the operation whole.

Comm. Bahar-Cook added that now EVE is asking for an additional $15,540.  The Judiciary Committee also gave funds to Legal Services which ultimately goes to domestic violence.  If this is granted the County would be spending close to $53,000 on domestic violence. 


Ms. Schultz stated that if you look at the statistics there is rational for that.  The statistics are extremely high.  Locally their operation has doubled the number of victims in the last six months.  The shelter is completely full right now.  They have 30 beds and have been running anywhere from 26 to 32, and have been that way since July.


Comm. Bahar-Cook added that the need for homeless, the need for food, and the need for all the emergency services makes it is difficult to weigh one emergency service over the other to justify the way this is leaning.

Ms. Schultz responded that she understands and added that they are not greedy people, they try to be collaborative people in this Community.

City of Lansing/Mayor’s Office Community Faith-Based Initiatives -   The Mayor’s Office Community of Faith-Based Initiatives has been empowered to organize many of the Faith-Based and Church institutions within our City that provide a plethora of services.  But they were not organized and there was duplication, they did not have the capacity to do their job effectively.  They want to bring those groups together collaboratively and help them work effectively within the Community.  The funding would be used for staffing.


Comm. Schor expressed his concern about the City of Lansing asking the County for Community Agency money.  It seems like a Governmental agency rather than a Community agency.  The concern is Governmental agency vs Community agency.


Comm. Grebner asked if it would be a 501C3 or City of Lansing.  The Mayor’s Office representative responded that it would be going to the City of Lansing.


Comm. Bahar-Cook asked if it was set up to capture Federal dollars.


Toiva Hinamann replied no, it was set up to fund the Faith-Based initiatives.  It is not a parallel with the Government.


Ingham East Habitat for Humanity – Liz Hogg - They are a restore that sells gently used furniture, appliances and building supplies.  They are requesting a one time and one time only contract.  They need the money to make their building more energy efficient.


Comm. Schor said that this is quite a large request and asked if any portion of the $7,385 would be going to help people in the Community meet a basic need.  If they were granted $2,000 or $3,000 would that meet a need?

Ms. Hogg explained how the funds would be spent -  $750 for floor fans, $150 shipping & handling, $550 for ceramic heaters, $110 for shipping & handling, $400 for shelving, this totals $1,960 to cool and heat the store.  An additional $2,015 is needed  for insulation, $1,050 for drywall and painting, $500 for labor to stud out the walls and some painting.  The insulation is the most important need.


Comm. Bahar-Cook asked how they fill a basic need in the Community.

Ms. Hogg responded that they keep a lot of stuff out of landfills, they provide low cost furniture, doors, windows, and appliances to people who may not be able to afford new.  They use the profits to build the Habitat for Humanity Houses.


Grace Tabernacle Church – $23,130.  Their need is for computers to stock their computer lab for training low income children.  They would serve about 250 at risk youth.


Bahar-Cook asked how many computers they would be buying.  Reverend Robert Nicholson responded that they would like to get eight to ten computers and internet hook up.


Bahar-Cook - How many kids do you expect to have per session.  He responded 8 to 12 kids for each training session.  The basic need filled would be education, life skills, employability for at risk youth.


Comm. Schor asked who would be allowed to use these computers.  The answer was the door will be open to any children. They also do family counseling.  It is for everyone.


South Side Community Coalition – David Wiener, Chair of the South Side Community Coalition Board.  Primary service is to at risk, low income, and young children.  They have an active after school program.  Students from MSU help mentor the young people.  In the summer they provide 50 to 70 children with breakfast and lunch.  They have a Senior program, two days a week, one day a week for youth.  They have a Food Pantry as well as a phone and old computers that people can use.  They are a part of the Ingham County Health Plan and canvassed over 1,000 households from which they signed up 300 people.  They are trying to be a full service Community Center, however, they have lost 30% of there funding with the cuts from the State.  They are asking for $6,000.


Comm. Bahar-Cook asked if they anticipate a one year request while they look for other funding sources, or will there be a need to come back year after year. 


Mr. Wiener said he cannot say they will not come back not knowing what their future is, but their hope is to find other funding sources.

Comm. Schor asked how many people generally come through the program.

Mr. Wiener responded that they will serve 450 people in the course of a year.


Comm. Hertel asked Mr. Cypher to compile the dollar amount of the agencies already funded, the requested amounts from those in attendance, and the amount for those who are not here if they were cut by 25%.


Comm. Hertel called for a 5 minute recess.


Back in session p.m. at 8:36


Jared Cypher reported funding amounts.  The amount already funded to agencies is $42,147, leaving $89,488 for the original total of $131,635.  If we funded returning Community Agencies at their full requested amounts, for those who were here that total would be $54,799.  Leaving a total of $34,689 remaining.  Then looking at the repeat Community Agencies who are not here, giving them a 25% cut the total comes to $23,507 that leaves $11,182 remaining.


Comm. Bahar-Cook has a problem with the Westside Community YMCA funding.  They were not in attendance so she suggested that they take the money requested and give it to another agency that needs it.  She is slightly uncomfortable with the two Cristo Rey Agencies, because she had questions for the Roots and Wings she needed answers for and that they were not present, the other one she feels is a duplication of services; she suggested both Cristo Rey funds be reduced by 50%.


MOTION BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SCHOR THAT WE SPEND THE $54,799 FOR THE REAPPLYING AGENCIES WHO WERE PRESENT AT THIS HEARING AND THE $23,507 FOR THE REAPPLYING AGENCIES WHO WERE NOT PRESENT, AT A 25% CUT.


Comm. Bahar-Cook clarified that for those who did not show, they should get a 25% cut.


Comm. Grebner raised his concern about cutting the Listening Ear by 25%.  They are a small agency that does a lot of good things.  He feels it is too harsh to cut the 25%.

MOVED BY COMM. GREBNER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SCHOR TO KEEP LISTENING EAR AT $6,602, THE PRESENT AMOUNT.  MOTION  CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.   Absent:  Comm. Severino


MOVED  BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK TO REDUCE THE FUNDING FOR YMCA FROM $4,061 TO 0.  MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF SUPPORT. 


MOVED BY COMM. SOULE, SUPPORTED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK TO CUT YMCA FROM $4,061 TO $2,000, MOTION CARRIED with Comms. Hertel and Schor voting  no.  Absent:  Comm. Severino


Bahar-Cook disclosed under the County Ethics Policy that The Greater Lansing Food Bank is a client, and Habitat for Humanity Michigan is a client.

MOVED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK, TO NOT FUND THE CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER – PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM AND THAT WE CUT THE ROOTS WINGS PROGRAM TO $2,000.  COMM. BAHAR-COOK WITHDREW THIS MOTION SINCE THEY ARE ON THE LIST TO BE CUT BY 25%.

Comm. Grebner asked for the list of Agencies that are proposed to be cut by 25%.

 

Mr. Cypher read of the following list of Agencies proposed to be cut by 25%:

Cristo Rey Root & Wings Anger Management for Teens

Listening Ear, Inc. was on this list but will now be funded at last year’s rate.
MSU Detroit College of Law Clinical Programs
South Lansing Community Development Association
St.
Vincent Catholic Charities/Ballentine Stepping Stones

St. Vincent Catholic Charities/CAIR Program

Westside Community YMCA was on this list but is now going to be funded at $2,000.


Comm. Schor asked for clarification about what the issues are with the two St. Vincent agencies.

Mr. Cypher explained that he received an e-mail from Comm. Thomas  that St. Vincent may be eliminating some senior programs.  He did some research and discovered that this was correct.  He phoned them to confirm but has not received a call back from their office to confirm this yet. 

Comm. Schor asked if anyone knows anything about this.

Margaret Houseman commented on behalf of St. Vincent for clarity.  She attended a meeting where they were trying to decide how to relate to the fact that St. Vincent Catholic Charities has decided to cut the CAIR Program.  There was quite a bit of Community support within the aging network to support the CAIR program under another umbrella and there was concern about whether the funding geared to this program could follow it.  That would be very helpful to them.  It is supposed to be eliminated by the end of December so this would be funding for 2008.

Comm. Grebner suggested that the funds be set aside so they would be there in the event they are needed when the program is taken over.


Comm. Thomas commented that the Lansing Area Parents’ Respite Center, Inc. has been in our Community for 10 or 15 years, they are a long standing program. Comm. Thomas understands that they happen to be housed in St. Vincent but not really a St. Vincent program.  Comm. Thomas stated that he would like to see this money be set aside in some appropriate way.  He would hate to see Lansing Area Parents’ Respite Center suffer because St.Vincent is being irresponsible.

Comm. Schor commented that he would be uncomfortable setting the money aside.  He would rather eliminate it now and if they come back for money later we give them the money on contingency.

MOVED BY COMM. SCHOR MOVED, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SOULE TO BRING THE ST. VINCENT’S CAIR PROGRAM DOWN TO 0.  MOTION CARRIED with Comm. Grebner voting no.  Absent: Comm. Severino


A brief discussion was held on what funds are still available at this point, after all the returning agencies have been considered, what is left for new agency funding.  Mr. Cypher reported that there is roughly $15,000 left for new agency funding.

MOVED BY COMM. GREBNER, TO GIVE THE MSU DETROIT COLLEGE OF LAW CLINICAL PROGRAMS $1,000.  MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF SUPPORT.


Comm. Grebner brought up that he is not completely comfortable with giving all the agencies that asked for larger amounts, the full amount that they have requested.  He would like to discuss shaving down the requested amounts.  Particularly Gateway Community Services.

MOVED BY COMM. GREBNER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SCHOR TO GIVE GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES $11,000. MOTION CARRIED with Comm. Hertel voting no.  Absent: Comm. Severino

MOVED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK, SUPPORTED BY COMM. GREBNER THAT THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ALCOHOLISM RECEIVE $5,000.  MOTION CARRIED with Comm. Hertel voting no.  Absent:  Comm. Severino


At 9:09 pm Chairperson Hertel called a short recess.  At 9:13 p.m., the meeting was back in session.  

Mr. Cypher reported that at this point $17,875 is unallocated.


MOVED BY COMM. SCHOR, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SOULE TO FUND $7,000 FOR EVE, $2,015 FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, $6,000 FOR SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY COALITION, $2,860 FOR THE WOMEN’S CENTER.   MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent:  Comm. Severino

 

Comm. Schor explained the reasons for his recommendations.  The Southside Community Coalition has plans to cover nine or ten basic needs.  Eve is one of the basic needs we should be supporting.  Habitat for Humanity organization as a whole does contribute to the greater good so we should give them funding to help their operation help out the Community.  The Women’s Center $2,860 is an appropriate amount since they did not show up.


Comm. Grebner expressed his desire to give more money to Habitat for Humanity because they are an organization that does the work they do for no pay. 


MOVED BY COMM. SOULE, SUPPORTED BY COMM. GREBNER TO AMEND THE MOTION TO GIVE $3,015 TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AND $5,000 TO SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY COALITION.  MOTION CARRIED with Comm. Schor voting no.  Absent: Comm. Severino

 

Comm. Bahar-Cook said while she personally supports The Women’s Center, she thinks a precedent would be set to fund an agency that did not come before the Committee.  

MOVED BY COMM. BAHAR-COOK, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SCHOR TO TAKE MONEY FROM THE WOMEN’S CENTER AND GIVE $4,015 TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, $7,860 TO EVE, AND $6,000 TO SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER.  MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent:  Comm. Severino  

 

Comm. Thomas stated that he is the one that suggested to the Women’s Center that they apply for funding.  He supports Comm. Bahar-Cook’s motion.   He would be very happy to go back to The Women’s Center and tell them that they should have attended.   And as long as they come next year their request will be looked upon favorably.

MOVED BY COMM. GREBNER, SUPPORTED BY COMM. SOULE TO AMEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TO INCLUDE A RESOLVE, THAT IT WAS PROPOSED AS A ONE TIME CAPITAL EXPENSE.  AND SUBMIT A LETTER REPORTING WHAT THEY DID WITH THOSE DOLLARS.  MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent:  Comm. Severino


Comm. Hertel stated that he would like to have given money to Grace Tabernacle Church.  He felt they are trying to fill a basic need to provide technology opportunity to children who otherwise would not be exposed to it.

Also he would like to have seen MSU Kinship Care attend because of all the good things they do, so that they could have received funding.  He hopes that if they apply next year they will do that in the future.


Comm. Grebner suggested that in the future the Committees should set-up a task force to do research and take a look at which of these agencies is the most efficient.   Use paid staff to do the review then bring it back to the Committees for their recommendations.

COMM. HERTEL ASKED ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE APPROVING ALL OF THE MOTIONS.   MOTIONS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.  Absent: Comm. Severino

Announcements:
Comm. Schor announced that on the first part of the Public Hearing, the 1st part of the Code change was his idea; the Health Department had the idea for the 2nd part. Comm. Schor has no problem with the signage but he really is only interested in the 1st part.

Public Comment:
None

The meeting adjourned at 9:36 P.M.

Respectfully submitted,

Judy Craddock